![]() |
|
What the Discrete Causal Screen (DCS) Measures — A Conceptual Guide - Printable Version +- The Lumin Archive (https://theluminarchive.co.uk) +-- Forum: The Lumin Archive — Core Forums (https://theluminarchive.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Publications & Research (https://theluminarchive.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +---- Forum: Lumin Archive Papers (https://theluminarchive.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=43) +---- Thread: What the Discrete Causal Screen (DCS) Measures — A Conceptual Guide (/showthread.php?tid=490) |
What the Discrete Causal Screen (DCS) Measures — A Conceptual Guide - Leejohnston - 01-14-2026 Author: Lee Johnston Affiliation: The Lumin Archive Status: Explanatory / Interpretive Companion to the DCS Framework ⸻ Purpose of This Guide The Discrete Causal Screen (DCS) framework introduces a new way to analyse information flow in discrete spacetime using causal structure alone. This post exists for one reason: To explain, in clear physical terms, what DCS is actually measuring, what it is not measuring, and why that distinction matters. No prior background in Causal Set Theory is assumed. Mathematical and computational details are intentionally omitted here and are provided separately in the primary research posts and code appendices. ⸻ The Core Question DCS Addresses At its heart, DCS asks a very simple but deep question: Given a region of spacetime, how many genuinely independent causal histories can enter it? Not how many paths exist. Not how many links connect events. But how many independent ways new causal influence can arrive. This distinction is critical. ⸻ Why Counting Paths Is Misleading In any causal spacetime (continuous or discrete): • The number of causal paths grows explosively. • Most of those paths are not independent. • Many merge, overlap, or share the same entry events. Counting all paths massively overestimates information capacity. DCS avoids this by focusing on where causal influence first enters, not how many ways it can wander afterward. ⸻ The First-Contact Principle To do this, DCS introduces a key object: The First-Contact Set Informally: The First-Contact set consists of those interior events which are the earliest causal recipients of influence from outside a chosen region. More precisely: • For each exterior event, consider all interior events it can causally affect. • Among those, identify the minimal elements — the ones that receive that influence first. • Collect the unique interior events that serve this role. These events form a causal cut-set. They are the true “entry ports” of information. ⸻ What the Discrete Causal Screen Is The Discrete Causal Screen is simply the boundary layer on which these First-Contact events live. It is not: • a surface in space, • a coordinate slice, • a chosen time step. It is: • a causally defined screen, determined purely by order relations. This makes it: • coordinate-independent, • metric-agnostic, • valid in curved, flat, and null geometries. ⸻ What DCS Measures (and What It Does Not) DCS Measures: • The causal bandwidth of a region. • The number of independent causal entry channels. • How this number scales with boundary structure. • How curvature and horizon geometry affect causal access. DCS Does Not Measure: • Energy • Dynamics • Field equations • Entropy directly • Thermodynamic state variables DCS is kinematic, not dynamical. It tells you what is possible, not what happens. ⸻ Why Boundary Scaling Emerges Naturally One of the most important outcomes of DCS is that: The number of independent causal entry points scales with the boundary, not the volume. This is not imposed. It emerges because: • causal influence must cross a minimal cut, • causal paths merge, • only a limited number of minimal events can serve as first contacts. This provides a structural explanation for why area laws appear so robust across physical theories. ⸻ Interpreting Curvature Effects When applied to different geometries, DCS reveals that: • Flat screens maximise causal fidelity. • Converging or diverging null geometries alter causal efficiency. • The density of causal access changes even when total flux does not. This shows that: • holographic behaviour is sensitive to geometry, • but governed by causal structure rather than coordinate choice. ⸻ Why This Matters The DCS framework provides: • A concrete, testable notion of causal information flow. • A bridge between causal set theory and holographic ideas. • A tool that can be applied to black holes, horizons, cosmology, and quantum gravity models. Most importantly, it does so without assuming entropy, temperature, or dynamics. That makes it a clean foundation on which many future investigations can build. ⸻ How to Use DCS Going Forward Readers interested in applying DCS can: • Use it as a diagnostic tool in numerical causal sets. • Compare causal bandwidth across geometries. • Test hypotheses about horizons without invoking thermodynamics. • Extend it to new causal structures or dimensions. Closing Remarks The Discrete Causal Screen is not a finished theory. It is a well-defined lens. A way of looking at spacetime that makes one particular question unavoidable: How much causal access does a region really have? Once you ask that question cleanly, the answers begin to organise themselves. ⸻ Citation (for reference) Johnston, L. Discrete Causal Screen (DCS): Boundary-Limited Information Flow in Causal Sets. The Lumin Archive, 2026. |