![]() |
|
Is Gravity a Force — Or an Emergent Effect? - Printable Version +- The Lumin Archive (https://theluminarchive.co.uk) +-- Forum: The Lumin Archive — Core Forums (https://theluminarchive.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Speculative Science & Thought Experiments (https://theluminarchive.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=82) +--- Thread: Is Gravity a Force — Or an Emergent Effect? (/showthread.php?tid=452) |
Is Gravity a Force — Or an Emergent Effect? - Leejohnston - 01-08-2026 Is Gravity a Force — Or an Emergent Effect? Gravity is the most familiar force in everyday life, yet it remains the least understood at a fundamental level. This has led physicists to ask a radical question: Is gravity really a force at all — or is it an emergent effect? ⸻ The classical view: gravity as a force In Newtonian physics, gravity is a force that: • acts between masses • weakens with distance • causes acceleration This model works extremely well for everyday phenomena and engineering. But it is incomplete. ⸻ Einstein’s shift: gravity as geometry In general relativity, gravity is not a force. Instead: • mass and energy curve spacetime • objects follow the straightest possible paths in that curved geometry • motion under gravity is actually free-fall From this view, gravity is a consequence of geometry, not interaction. ⸻ The problem with quantizing gravity Every other fundamental interaction has been successfully described by quantum field theory. Gravity has not. Attempts to treat gravity like a standard force lead to: • mathematical infinities • non-renormalizable theories • breakdowns at small scales This failure hints that gravity may not be fundamental in the same way. ⸻ The emergent gravity idea Some speculative models suggest: • gravity emerges from microscopic degrees of freedom • spacetime behaves like a thermodynamic system • gravitational attraction arises from entropy or information flow In this view: • gravity is like pressure or temperature • real, measurable, but not fundamental ⸻ Hints that support emergence Several clues motivate this idea: • black hole entropy scales with surface area, not volume • spacetime horizons behave thermodynamically • gravitational equations resemble equations of state These parallels may not be coincidental. ⸻ What emergent gravity does NOT imply Emergent gravity does not mean: • gravity is an illusion • gravity can be turned off • Einstein was wrong It means gravity could be a large-scale effect of deeper physics. ⸻ Why this matters If gravity is emergent: • spacetime itself may not be fundamental • quantum gravity may require new concepts • reality could be built from information, not geometry ⸻ Open question Is gravity a fundamental interaction — or the macroscopic shadow of something deeper? The answer could redefine what “space” even means. |