The Lumin Archive
Is Gravity a Force — Or an Emergent Effect? - Printable Version

+- The Lumin Archive (https://theluminarchive.co.uk)
+-- Forum: The Lumin Archive — Core Forums (https://theluminarchive.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Speculative Science & Thought Experiments (https://theluminarchive.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=82)
+--- Thread: Is Gravity a Force — Or an Emergent Effect? (/showthread.php?tid=452)



Is Gravity a Force — Or an Emergent Effect? - Leejohnston - 01-08-2026

Is Gravity a Force — Or an Emergent Effect?

Gravity is the most familiar force in everyday life, yet it remains the least understood at a fundamental level.

This has led physicists to ask a radical question:

Is gravity really a force at all — or is it an emergent effect?



The classical view: gravity as a force

In Newtonian physics, gravity is a force that:
• acts between masses
• weakens with distance
• causes acceleration

This model works extremely well for everyday phenomena and engineering.

But it is incomplete.



Einstein’s shift: gravity as geometry

In general relativity, gravity is not a force.

Instead:
• mass and energy curve spacetime
• objects follow the straightest possible paths in that curved geometry
• motion under gravity is actually free-fall

From this view, gravity is a consequence of geometry, not interaction.



The problem with quantizing gravity

Every other fundamental interaction has been successfully described by quantum field theory.

Gravity has not.

Attempts to treat gravity like a standard force lead to:
• mathematical infinities
• non-renormalizable theories
• breakdowns at small scales

This failure hints that gravity may not be fundamental in the same way.



The emergent gravity idea

Some speculative models suggest:
• gravity emerges from microscopic degrees of freedom
• spacetime behaves like a thermodynamic system
• gravitational attraction arises from entropy or information flow

In this view:
• gravity is like pressure or temperature
• real, measurable, but not fundamental



Hints that support emergence

Several clues motivate this idea:
• black hole entropy scales with surface area, not volume
• spacetime horizons behave thermodynamically
• gravitational equations resemble equations of state

These parallels may not be coincidental.



What emergent gravity does NOT imply

Emergent gravity does not mean:
• gravity is an illusion
• gravity can be turned off
• Einstein was wrong

It means gravity could be a large-scale effect of deeper physics.



Why this matters

If gravity is emergent:
• spacetime itself may not be fundamental
• quantum gravity may require new concepts
• reality could be built from information, not geometry



Open question

Is gravity a fundamental interaction —
or the macroscopic shadow of something deeper?

The answer could redefine what “space” even means.